🔰فراخوان دریافت آثار نشریه ملی ندا (نشریه تخصصی علوم دامی و صنایع غذایی، دارای مجوز رسمی از وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری)
🖇 از تمام علاقه‌مندان حوزه علوم دامی و صنایع غذایی دعوت می‌شود که آثار خود را در محورهای زیر تا تاریخ اعلام شده ارسال نمایند.
📝محور مطالب: ▪️مقالات علمی-ترویجی ▪️معرفی کتب منتشر شده ▪️دستاوردهای نوآورانه و فناورانه ▪️چکیده پایان‌نامه‌های دانشجویی و رساله‌های دانشجویی ▪️استارتاپ‌ها و شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان ▪️چالش‌ها و راهکارهای صنعت و...
🔰فراخوان دریافت آثار نشریه ملی ندا (نشریه تخصصی علوم دامی و صنایع غذایی، دارای مجوز رسمی از وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری)
🖇 از تمام علاقه‌مندان حوزه علوم دامی و صنایع غذایی دعوت می‌شود که آثار خود را در محورهای زیر تا تاریخ اعلام شده ارسال نمایند.
📝محور مطالب: ▪️مقالات علمی-ترویجی ▪️معرفی کتب منتشر شده ▪️دستاوردهای نوآورانه و فناورانه ▪️چکیده پایان‌نامه‌های دانشجویی و رساله‌های دانشجویی ▪️استارتاپ‌ها و شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان ▪️چالش‌ها و راهکارهای صنعت و...
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from sa
