После объединения со «Справедливой Россией» в феврале представители партии «За правду» предложили назначить «своих людей» в качестве руководителей целого ряда реготделений обновленной партии, рассказал «Ведомостям» Николай Новичков – один из соратников экс-лидера «За правду», а теперь сопредседателя справороссов Захара Прилепина. По его словам, помимо Рязанской области, откуда родом Прилепин, это Саратовская, Воронежская, Смоленская области.
После объединения со «Справедливой Россией» в феврале представители партии «За правду» предложили назначить «своих людей» в качестве руководителей целого ряда реготделений обновленной партии, рассказал «Ведомостям» Николай Новичков – один из соратников экс-лидера «За правду», а теперь сопредседателя справороссов Захара Прилепина. По его словам, помимо Рязанской области, откуда родом Прилепин, это Саратовская, Воронежская, Смоленская области.
BY Пять партий
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from sa
