📺ТЫ ПОМНИШЬ, КАК ВСЁ НАЧИНАЛОСЬ... Самый эгоистичный стрим. Расскажу о том, почему загнулся подкаст 50 оттенков права,своём пути в адвокатуру, ожиданиях от адвокатской деятельности и реальности, самом большом страхе и почему до сих пор не ухожу из профессии.
📅 23.03.2024 г., суббота 🕖 19:00-20:00 📺 YouTube-канал Правовые алгоритмы (ссылку на стрим пришлю за 20 минут до начала)
📺ТЫ ПОМНИШЬ, КАК ВСЁ НАЧИНАЛОСЬ... Самый эгоистичный стрим. Расскажу о том, почему загнулся подкаст 50 оттенков права,своём пути в адвокатуру, ожиданиях от адвокатской деятельности и реальности, самом большом страхе и почему до сих пор не ухожу из профессии.
📅 23.03.2024 г., суббота 🕖 19:00-20:00 📺 YouTube-канал Правовые алгоритмы (ссылку на стрим пришлю за 20 минут до начала)
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. 'Wild West' A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from sa
