Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 3321 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50

Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 4096 of 7417 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
[J O S T], :rolf | Telegram Webview: anderefakten/1067 -
Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Forwarded from H A L T E R, :daniel
Das SCHKG ist mit der Nummer 281.1 im Privatrecht geregelt.



group-telegram.com/anderefakten/1067
Create:
Last Update:

Das SCHKG ist mit der Nummer 281.1 im Privatrecht geregelt.

BY [J O S T], :rolf




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/anderefakten/1067

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts.
from sa


Telegram [J O S T], :rolf
FROM American