New York Times, серьезно опасающаяся за судьбу Национальных институтов здравоохранения США (NIH) при Трампе, дает интересную статистику: NIH поддержали исследования, которые дали более 100 Нобелевских премий и более 99% лекарств, одобренных для применения в США в 2010-2019 гг. (Аналогов NIH в РФ, увы, нет и пока не предвидится).
Research supported by the agency has led to more than 100 Nobel Prizes and has supported more than 99 percent of the drugs approved by federal regulators from 2010 to 2019.
New York Times, серьезно опасающаяся за судьбу Национальных институтов здравоохранения США (NIH) при Трампе, дает интересную статистику: NIH поддержали исследования, которые дали более 100 Нобелевских премий и более 99% лекарств, одобренных для применения в США в 2010-2019 гг. (Аналогов NIH в РФ, увы, нет и пока не предвидится).
Research supported by the agency has led to more than 100 Nobel Prizes and has supported more than 99 percent of the drugs approved by federal regulators from 2010 to 2019.
BY Нейроинтерфейсы
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from sa
