🇷🇺🪖ВС РФ ракетным ударом по бывшему гостиничному комплексу «Харьков Палас» уничтожили представителей ГУР и ВСУ, принимавших непосредственное участие в планировании и исполнении теракта в Белгороде - Минобороны РФ
🇷🇺🪖ВС РФ ракетным ударом по бывшему гостиничному комплексу «Харьков Палас» уничтожили представителей ГУР и ВСУ, принимавших непосредственное участие в планировании и исполнении теракта в Белгороде - Минобороны РФ
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp.
from sa