Вот в этом вся Баба Ната. Ее уровень и масштаб: доеб…ся до мундепа из-за незадекларированных его же 100 тыс. рублей, в то время как у самой под носом воруют миллиардами.
Он, кстати, если не вру, в КПРФ состоит. В этом, думаю, и вся причина. Плюс постоянно геморр создавал своей активностью на почве экологии.
Вот в этом вся Баба Ната. Ее уровень и масштаб: доеб…ся до мундепа из-за незадекларированных его же 100 тыс. рублей, в то время как у самой под носом воруют миллиардами.
Он, кстати, если не вру, в КПРФ состоит. В этом, думаю, и вся причина. Плюс постоянно геморр создавал своей активностью на почве экологии.
BY ДРУГой Комаровский
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from sa
