🏳️🇺🇳Вывод войск МИНУСМА с базы в Кидале под защитой CSP-PSD
Официальный Бамако заблокировал вылеты, с целью взятия под контроль базы быстрее азавадцев.
Вывод из Кидаля был запланирован на 15 ноября, но сегодня в 10 утра(по местному времени), последние миротворцы покинули базу. Вооружение не поджигалось, оставлено на базе.
🏳️🇺🇳Вывод войск МИНУСМА с базы в Кидале под защитой CSP-PSD
Официальный Бамако заблокировал вылеты, с целью взятия под контроль базы быстрее азавадцев.
Вывод из Кидаля был запланирован на 15 ноября, но сегодня в 10 утра(по местному времени), последние миротворцы покинули базу. Вооружение не поджигалось, оставлено на базе.
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from sa
