Соседи из Удмуртской Республики уже положили глаз на Илона Маска.
Но без вариантов, коллеги, в Татарстане помимо развитой инфраструктуры есть ечпочмаки, чак-чак и бәлеш, устоять против таких аргументов не возможно. Маск наш! https://www.group-telegram.com/HouseofcardsUdm/4200
Соседи из Удмуртской Республики уже положили глаз на Илона Маска.
Но без вариантов, коллеги, в Татарстане помимо развитой инфраструктуры есть ечпочмаки, чак-чак и бәлеш, устоять против таких аргументов не возможно. Маск наш! https://www.group-telegram.com/HouseofcardsUdm/4200
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In addition, Telegram now supports the use of third-party streaming tools like OBS Studio and XSplit to broadcast live video, allowing users to add overlays and multi-screen layouts for a more professional look. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from sa
