Forwarded from Disclose.tv
JUST IN - Elon's xAI raises $6B in Series C funding, partnering with Blackrock, Sequoia Capital and others.
https://www.disclose.tv/id/r7so7h8f40/
@disclosetv
https://www.disclose.tv/id/r7so7h8f40/
@disclosetv
Disclose.tv
Elon's xAI raises $6B and partners with Blackrock, Sequoia Capital and others
Breaking news from around the world.
Forwarded from Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
Illegal savages are burning White women alive on NYC subways and nobody is doing shit about it.
This illegal came to the US during Trump’s first term btw.
This illegal came to the US during Trump’s first term btw.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This video made me reflect on how many men express their emotions through stories and parables. Unlike most women, who often identify and articulate specific emotions, many men tend to reveal their most profound introspective thoughts and tender heartfelt truths in a manner that feels more organic to them. As men gain wisdom through experience, they frequently share it by inviting you to journey with them through narrative.
The challenge - and perhaps the disconnect - lies in the fact that understanding the underlying message, hidden in plain sight, requires one to listen with intent and to genuinely care. For example, a man might recount a seemingly serendipitous altruistic interaction with another woman that he found memorable. While some women may perceive this as merely a beautiful moment or even a reason for jealousy, he is often conveying something deeper - such as a personal shift in his perspective on the purpose of cross-gender relationships. Crucially, discernment and attentiveness are required to notice the subtle emotional shifts he expresses while sharing himself with you.
If we choose to truly listen to men, we will find that they are always telling us what holds meaning for them and how they feel.
@FlurkFellows
The challenge - and perhaps the disconnect - lies in the fact that understanding the underlying message, hidden in plain sight, requires one to listen with intent and to genuinely care. For example, a man might recount a seemingly serendipitous altruistic interaction with another woman that he found memorable. While some women may perceive this as merely a beautiful moment or even a reason for jealousy, he is often conveying something deeper - such as a personal shift in his perspective on the purpose of cross-gender relationships. Crucially, discernment and attentiveness are required to notice the subtle emotional shifts he expresses while sharing himself with you.
If we choose to truly listen to men, we will find that they are always telling us what holds meaning for them and how they feel.
@FlurkFellows
Mental Shortcut for Normies:
It's best to choose your beliefs based on what you know.
Some people base their beliefs on what other people say instead, and they are easily fooled. Those people will always exist.
They say things like "it's the news - why would they lie?" or "you agree with Alex Jones? You must be stupid because he is stupid!"
They never have thoughts like "do I know this is true/false?" and they always have thoughts like "does it make me look good to agree with this source?"
If you are one of those people, and you want to graduate to a higher level of thinking, try this:
Whenever you hear an important idea or bit of information that people are disagreeing about - like news items for example - think to yourself: "which one of these sources cares more about me? which one actually wants good things to happen to me?"
The answer isn't always going to be the source that's most correct, but this extra step will train you to notice when someone's giving you bad information in order to fool you.
Some examples:
"My father says mass immigration is bad, but all of my cool friends and professors say it's good."
Who really wants the best for you here? Who is it actually smarter to trust?
"This stripper I've been handing wads of $1 and $5 bills to all night says that she likes me, but all my friends say she's just trying to get more of my money. WHY WOULD SHE LIE?"
Which of these conflicting opinions is coming from someone who has proven that they support you? Which one is coming from someone who can benefit at your expense?
One more:
"The man from the government went on TV to say that the new, untested medical treatment is safe and effective, even though it is not possible to know this without testing. My friend says he doubts this, and is not willing to accept the treatment. Why is he too stupid to trust government and TV?"
Think hard about which one of these parties has lied to you before and covered it up. Which one has something to gain? Which one has something to lose? Has one of these parties - TV, government, friend - tricked you before?
So there you have it.
One simple mental trick can make you a lot less likely to be fooled again. Whenever the truth is not clear and people are arguing, ask yourself: "which of these people would fool me for gain, and which ones would suffer loss to protect me?"
It'll make the answer a little more clear.
@FlurkFellows
It's best to choose your beliefs based on what you know.
Some people base their beliefs on what other people say instead, and they are easily fooled. Those people will always exist.
They say things like "it's the news - why would they lie?" or "you agree with Alex Jones? You must be stupid because he is stupid!"
They never have thoughts like "do I know this is true/false?" and they always have thoughts like "does it make me look good to agree with this source?"
If you are one of those people, and you want to graduate to a higher level of thinking, try this:
Whenever you hear an important idea or bit of information that people are disagreeing about - like news items for example - think to yourself: "which one of these sources cares more about me? which one actually wants good things to happen to me?"
The answer isn't always going to be the source that's most correct, but this extra step will train you to notice when someone's giving you bad information in order to fool you.
Some examples:
"My father says mass immigration is bad, but all of my cool friends and professors say it's good."
Who really wants the best for you here? Who is it actually smarter to trust?
"This stripper I've been handing wads of $1 and $5 bills to all night says that she likes me, but all my friends say she's just trying to get more of my money. WHY WOULD SHE LIE?"
Which of these conflicting opinions is coming from someone who has proven that they support you? Which one is coming from someone who can benefit at your expense?
One more:
"The man from the government went on TV to say that the new, untested medical treatment is safe and effective, even though it is not possible to know this without testing. My friend says he doubts this, and is not willing to accept the treatment. Why is he too stupid to trust government and TV?"
Think hard about which one of these parties has lied to you before and covered it up. Which one has something to gain? Which one has something to lose? Has one of these parties - TV, government, friend - tricked you before?
So there you have it.
One simple mental trick can make you a lot less likely to be fooled again. Whenever the truth is not clear and people are arguing, ask yourself: "which of these people would fool me for gain, and which ones would suffer loss to protect me?"
It'll make the answer a little more clear.
@FlurkFellows
Forwarded from TabZ - Alternative Media
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Peruvian Interior Ministry released a video of a police operation in Lima featuring an officer dressed as the green fairytale character, the Grinch.
The costumed officer used a sledgehammer to break down the door of a drug den, assisted in conducting searches, and participated in interrogating the suspects. The raid led to the seizure of a significant quantity of drugs.
@TabZLIVE
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (ȚepeȘ)
Qatar will stop shipping gas to the EU if member states strictly enforce a new law cracking down on forced labour and environmental damage, Energy Minister Saad al-Kaabi told the Financial Times in an interview published on Sunday.
The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, approved this year, requires larger companies operating in the European Union to check whether their supply chains use forced labour or cause environmental damage and to take action if they do. Penalties include fines of up to 5% of global turnover.
"If the case is that I lose 5% of my generated revenue by going to Europe, I will not go to Europe. I’m not bluffing, Kaabi told the newspaper, adding that "5% of generated revenue of QatarEnergy means 5% of generated revenue of the Qatar state. This is the people's money, so I cannot lose that kind of money - and nobody would accept losing that kind of money."
Kaabi, the chief executive of state-owned QatarEnergy, has said the EU should thoroughly review the due diligence law. He has also said that his Gulf country has no concerns about U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's promise to lift a cap on liquefied natural gas exports.
Qatar, among the world's top LNG exporters, is seeking to play a larger role in Asia and Europe as competition from top supplier the United Sates increases. It plans to expand its liquefaction capacity to 142 million tons per year by 2027 from 77 million.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
archive.ph
Qatar vows to stop EU gas sales if fined under due diligence law, FT …
archived 22 Dec 2024 06:43:26 UTC
Forwarded from Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
BREAKING: Guatemalan jewish compound raided for child trafficking, 160 children saved
More info coming soon
More info coming soon
Forwarded from Judge Frog’s S’more Cult
Forwarded from Judge Frog’s S’more Cult