В силу рабочей необходимости изучаю сейчас сведения из реестра Минюста РФ (скачал сегодня прямо отсюда), и это цифры действующих адвокатов. Пришлось вручную фильтровать сведения из файла в котором 150к записей.
Первые две строчки сразу наводят на простой вывод: любой legaltech в России прежде всего московский. Тот кто возьмёт (рынок) Москву, тот возьмёт всю Россию.
Безусловно надо учитывать субъектовую специфику, но нет законности рязанской, костромской, нижегородской и даже чеченской. Есть только московская мода.
В силу рабочей необходимости изучаю сейчас сведения из реестра Минюста РФ (скачал сегодня прямо отсюда), и это цифры действующих адвокатов. Пришлось вручную фильтровать сведения из файла в котором 150к записей.
Первые две строчки сразу наводят на простой вывод: любой legaltech в России прежде всего московский. Тот кто возьмёт (рынок) Москву, тот возьмёт всю Россию.
Безусловно надо учитывать субъектовую специфику, но нет законности рязанской, костромской, нижегородской и даже чеченской. Есть только московская мода.
Also in the latest update is the ability for users to create a unique @username from the Settings page, providing others with an easy way to contact them via Search or their t.me/username link without sharing their phone number. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from sa
