Подоляк: «Даже если мы бы сегодня остановились, нашли какой-то компромисс, Минск 3.0 подписали, Россия будет настаивать на том, что мы должны отдать всю Запорожскую область, включая город Запорожье».
Вот тоже проклёвывается поле для компромисса «временной остановки»?
Подоляк: «Даже если мы бы сегодня остановились, нашли какой-то компромисс, Минск 3.0 подписали, Россия будет настаивать на том, что мы должны отдать всю Запорожскую область, включая город Запорожье».
Вот тоже проклёвывается поле для компромисса «временной остановки»?
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts.
from sa
