⚠️حبيت أحذركم من بوتات الربح، مفيش حاجة اسمها الربح من بوت فكونوا اذكياء، لا بوت ربح ولا بوت عملات ولا أي كلام فاضي، الهدف هو تجميع أعضاء وبس، يوهمك انه معك نقاط واموال وعملات وهو كذب وتلاعب بالناس المساكين، دمتم سالمين، وكل عام وانتم بخير.
⚠️حبيت أحذركم من بوتات الربح، مفيش حاجة اسمها الربح من بوت فكونوا اذكياء، لا بوت ربح ولا بوت عملات ولا أي كلام فاضي، الهدف هو تجميع أعضاء وبس، يوهمك انه معك نقاط واموال وعملات وهو كذب وتلاعب بالناس المساكين، دمتم سالمين، وكل عام وانتم بخير.
BY تطبيقات إسلامية 🕌
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from sa
