Бля мне эту хуйню старший брат друга показал, мне лет семь было, сказав, что это настоящее видео (он не шибко умён был, мб правда так думал). Потом пиздец боялся, что рано или поздно в хату ворвётся Епифанцев и начнет всех хуярить из-за тайда (самый хуевый порошок).
Бля мне эту хуйню старший брат друга показал, мне лет семь было, сказав, что это настоящее видео (он не шибко умён был, мб правда так думал). Потом пиздец боялся, что рано или поздно в хату ворвётся Епифанцев и начнет всех хуярить из-за тайда (самый хуевый порошок).
BY Мухи и Полынь
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Sebi said data, emails and other documents are being retrieved from the seized devices and detailed investigation is in progress. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from sa
