«جاستین سان»، بنیان‌گذار شرکت کریپتویی ترون، چند وقت پیش اثری هنری به نام «Comedian» را ۶ میلیون و ۲۰۰ هزار دلار خرید. این اثر هنری یک موز چسبیده به دیوار بود. حالا سان در هتلی در هنگ‌کنگ، در مقابل دوربین‌ها، این موز را خورد!
«جاستین سان»، بنیان‌گذار شرکت کریپتویی ترون، چند وقت پیش اثری هنری به نام «Comedian» را ۶ میلیون و ۲۰۰ هزار دلار خرید. این اثر هنری یک موز چسبیده به دیوار بود. حالا سان در هتلی در هنگ‌کنگ، در مقابل دوربین‌ها، این موز را خورد!
But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." READ MORE In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from sa
