Я в секретном форуме не участвовала, но была на секретных приемах пищи с секретными участниками форума. Была ужасно рада всех повидать, а с кем-то встретиться лично впервые. В общем, мне очень понравилось. Какая-то невероятно приятная атмосфера, все очень милые, интересные, а главное умные. Вот вообще обычно не люблю такие мероприятия, но тут вынуждена признать - было классно.
Я в секретном форуме не участвовала, но была на секретных приемах пищи с секретными участниками форума. Была ужасно рада всех повидать, а с кем-то встретиться лично впервые. В общем, мне очень понравилось. Какая-то невероятно приятная атмосфера, все очень милые, интересные, а главное умные. Вот вообще обычно не люблю такие мероприятия, но тут вынуждена признать - было классно.
BY ПЕВЧИХ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from sa
