(روز قلم های تیز ، شور و نشاط ،تجربه های جدید، کار گروهی، عطش یادگیری، زندگی مستقل، شبکه سازی، چالش های عاطفی ، تحمل شکست، تغییر زاویه دید ، آزمون اعتماد ، تعهد اجتماعی ،توسعه مهارت ، آزادی و استقلال ، هوشیاری سیاسی ، خدمت به وطن ، معنویت و اخلاق و..)
(روز قلم های تیز ، شور و نشاط ،تجربه های جدید، کار گروهی، عطش یادگیری، زندگی مستقل، شبکه سازی، چالش های عاطفی ، تحمل شکست، تغییر زاویه دید ، آزمون اعتماد ، تعهد اجتماعی ،توسعه مهارت ، آزادی و استقلال ، هوشیاری سیاسی ، خدمت به وطن ، معنویت و اخلاق و..)
The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from sa
