Это не честность, это маркетинг. За много букафф в фальшивых рецензиях платить перестали, пытается продать себя новым хозяевам в качестве «политического кинокритика». Ну и палит всех, конечно. Бывшие подельники теперь расходники. Особенно те, кто – остались, затаились и молчат.
Это не честность, это маркетинг. За много букафф в фальшивых рецензиях платить перестали, пытается продать себя новым хозяевам в качестве «политического кинокритика». Ну и палит всех, конечно. Бывшие подельники теперь расходники. Особенно те, кто – остались, затаились и молчат.
Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels.
from sa
