💰Квартира генерала Лапина может стоить более 120 миллионов рублей
В прошлом посте оценивалась лишь кадастровая стоимость квартиры, однако реальная цена может быть сильно выше.
Мы нашли объявление похожей по площади квартиры в этом доме за 120 миллионов рублей. Однако в объявлении указано три комнаты, а у генерала Лапина — семь.
💰Квартира генерала Лапина может стоить более 120 миллионов рублей
В прошлом посте оценивалась лишь кадастровая стоимость квартиры, однако реальная цена может быть сильно выше.
Мы нашли объявление похожей по площади квартиры в этом доме за 120 миллионов рублей. Однако в объявлении указано три комнаты, а у генерала Лапина — семь.
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report.
from sa
