📋Госдума ужесточила административные санкции за утечку персональных данных
Также была принята поправка о наказании до 5 лет лишения свободы за незаконное использование персональных данных несовершеннолетних. И об уголовной ответственности за создание сайтов с незаконным оборотом персданных.
📋Госдума ужесточила административные санкции за утечку персональных данных
Также была принята поправка о наказании до 5 лет лишения свободы за незаконное использование персональных данных несовершеннолетних. И об уголовной ответственности за создание сайтов с незаконным оборотом персданных.
BY Москва - это интересно
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. "Markets were cheering this economic recovery and return to strong economic growth, but the cheers will turn to tears if the inflation outbreak pushes businesses and consumers to the brink of recession," he added. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from sa
