Кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры английского языка и профессиональной коммуникации Финансового университета при Правительстве Российской Федерации Наталья Валерьевна Тимкопрочитает лекцию 💬 «Перевод как инструмент межкультурной коммуникации. Лингвоэтнические барьеры в переводе»🔽
Кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры английского языка и профессиональной коммуникации Финансового университета при Правительстве Российской Федерации Наталья Валерьевна Тимкопрочитает лекцию 💬 «Перевод как инструмент межкультурной коммуникации. Лингвоэтнические барьеры в переводе»🔽
Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from sa
