Частенько страдаю от невозможности остановиться на наших дорогах
Бывает едешь такой, а на небе начинается сумасшедшей красоты закат. Или ещё что-то интересное. Тебе жутко хочется это рассмотреть и сфотографировать, но ты мчишься по скоростной трассе и остановка запрещена. А там где можно, по вселенскому закону подлости, уже не так красиво.
⁉️А вы бы обратили внимание на такие облака? Ниже сейчас появится анонимный опрос, не поленитесь тыцкнуть, ок?
Частенько страдаю от невозможности остановиться на наших дорогах
Бывает едешь такой, а на небе начинается сумасшедшей красоты закат. Или ещё что-то интересное. Тебе жутко хочется это рассмотреть и сфотографировать, но ты мчишься по скоростной трассе и остановка запрещена. А там где можно, по вселенскому закону подлости, уже не так красиво.
⁉️А вы бы обратили внимание на такие облака? Ниже сейчас появится анонимный опрос, не поленитесь тыцкнуть, ок?
Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from sa
