Пока нет крови в кадре, нет понимания серьезности проблемы…
Наверное надо показать, что происходит сейчас в приюте. Мелман вскрыли абсцесс - реакция на инъекцию, некроз, судя по всему задело и нерв, поэтому ниже этого места лапку не чувствует.
Пока нет крови в кадре, нет понимания серьезности проблемы…
Наверное надо показать, что происходит сейчас в приюте. Мелман вскрыли абсцесс - реакция на инъекцию, некроз, судя по всему задело и нерв, поэтому ниже этого места лапку не чувствует.
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from sa
