Сотни протестующих в Сухуми скандировали намедни эту «миленькую» кричалку в ожидании итогов переговоров с президентом.
А Россия чего? А ничего. Задействовать Росгвардию сыкотно, всё же Абхазия не РФ. И повторить советские подвиги по экспорту яиц с сапогами и погонами уже никак. Впрочем, это и к лучшему.
Сотни протестующих в Сухуми скандировали намедни эту «миленькую» кричалку в ожидании итогов переговоров с президентом.
А Россия чего? А ничего. Задействовать Росгвардию сыкотно, всё же Абхазия не РФ. И повторить советские подвиги по экспорту яиц с сапогами и погонами уже никак. Впрочем, это и к лучшему.
BY Пятилетка
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp.
from sa
