Миллий контентни яратиш ва миллий қадриятларимизни келажак авлодларга етказишда Ахборот хизматларининг ҳам ўрни беқиёс
Вилоят ҳокимлиги мажлислар залида айни шу масалаларга бағишланган йиғилиш ўтказилди. Унда вилоят ташкилотларининг раҳбарлари ва матбуот котиблари иштирок этди.
Миллий контентни яратиш ва миллий қадриятларимизни келажак авлодларга етказишда Ахборот хизматларининг ҳам ўрни беқиёс
Вилоят ҳокимлиги мажлислар залида айни шу масалаларга бағишланган йиғилиш ўтказилди. Унда вилоят ташкилотларининг раҳбарлари ва матбуот котиблари иштирок этди.
"The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from sa