Yomg‘irda, yomg‘irli kunlarda odamlar o‘zlarini boshqacharoq his etishadi. O‘zgacha maroq bilan uxlashadi. Qandaydir baxtliroq, qandaydir xotirjam his etishadi o‘zlarini. Masalan, menda shunaqa. Sizda ham shundaymi?
Bu xotirjamlikning sabablaridan birini olimlar inson genetikasiga muhrlanib qolgan qo‘rquv hissi bilan bog‘lashibdi.
Yomg‘ir yog‘ib turgan paytda odamlarga hujum qilishi mumkin bo‘lgan, odamlarni yeydigan yirtqich hayvonlar ovga chiqishmas ekan. Shu sababli juda qadim zamonlarda himoyasiz bo‘lgan insonlar genetik kodlarida yomg‘ir paytida uxlash xavfsiz degan tushuncha muhrlanib qolganmish. Ana shu sabab insonlar beixtiyor yomg‘irli kunlarda o‘zlarini boshqacharoq his etadi, xotirjam bo‘ladi deya fikr bildirishibdi olimlar.
Bu fikrlar qanchalik asosli yoki asossiz bilmadim. Hozircha bu ilmiy bir qarash. Ammo men bu qarashga ishondim. Menga juda asoslidek tuyildi. Yomg‘irli kunda yirtqichlar ov qilmasligiga ishonchim komil bo‘lgani bois Oynur bilan ozroq o‘ynadik 😃 Yomg‘irli havoda maza qilib kezindik.
Bugun boshqa qaytmaydi. Uni maroq bilan o‘tkazing. Ayniqsa, yomg‘irli kunlarni. Chunki ko‘chada sizga xavf soladigan yirtqichlar bo‘lmasligiga olimlar kafolat berishmoqda 😁
Yomg‘irda, yomg‘irli kunlarda odamlar o‘zlarini boshqacharoq his etishadi. O‘zgacha maroq bilan uxlashadi. Qandaydir baxtliroq, qandaydir xotirjam his etishadi o‘zlarini. Masalan, menda shunaqa. Sizda ham shundaymi?
Bu xotirjamlikning sabablaridan birini olimlar inson genetikasiga muhrlanib qolgan qo‘rquv hissi bilan bog‘lashibdi.
Yomg‘ir yog‘ib turgan paytda odamlarga hujum qilishi mumkin bo‘lgan, odamlarni yeydigan yirtqich hayvonlar ovga chiqishmas ekan. Shu sababli juda qadim zamonlarda himoyasiz bo‘lgan insonlar genetik kodlarida yomg‘ir paytida uxlash xavfsiz degan tushuncha muhrlanib qolganmish. Ana shu sabab insonlar beixtiyor yomg‘irli kunlarda o‘zlarini boshqacharoq his etadi, xotirjam bo‘ladi deya fikr bildirishibdi olimlar.
Bu fikrlar qanchalik asosli yoki asossiz bilmadim. Hozircha bu ilmiy bir qarash. Ammo men bu qarashga ishondim. Menga juda asoslidek tuyildi. Yomg‘irli kunda yirtqichlar ov qilmasligiga ishonchim komil bo‘lgani bois Oynur bilan ozroq o‘ynadik 😃 Yomg‘irli havoda maza qilib kezindik.
Bugun boshqa qaytmaydi. Uni maroq bilan o‘tkazing. Ayniqsa, yomg‘irli kunlarni. Chunki ko‘chada sizga xavf soladigan yirtqichlar bo‘lmasligiga olimlar kafolat berishmoqda 😁
In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from sa
