✏️وقتی محسن از ساختمان هلال‌احمر بیرون آمد، از خوشحالی در پوست خود نمی‌گنجید.
بعد از مدت‌ها انتظار، به او خبر داده بودند که آخر هفته نوبتش شده و به منطقه اعزام می‌شود. از خوشحالی نفهمید چطور تا مسجد محله‌شان رانندگی کرد. چند مسافر را هم سوار کرد و...
✏️وقتی محسن از ساختمان هلال‌احمر بیرون آمد، از خوشحالی در پوست خود نمی‌گنجید.
بعد از مدت‌ها انتظار، به او خبر داده بودند که آخر هفته نوبتش شده و به منطقه اعزام می‌شود. از خوشحالی نفهمید چطور تا مسجد محله‌شان رانندگی کرد. چند مسافر را هم سوار کرد و...
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from sa
