Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
▶️ Экипаж истребителя-бомбардировщика Су-34 ВКС России нанес удар по скоплению личного состава и техники Вооруженных сил Украины в приграничном районе Курской области. Об этом сообщили в Минобороны РФ.

Видео: Минобороны РФ/ ТАСС
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM



group-telegram.com/tass_agency/288197
Create:
Last Update:

▶️ Экипаж истребителя-бомбардировщика Су-34 ВКС России нанес удар по скоплению личного состава и техники Вооруженных сил Украины в приграничном районе Курской области. Об этом сообщили в Минобороны РФ.

Видео: Минобороны РФ/ ТАСС

BY ТАСС


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/tass_agency/288197

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. "The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from sa


Telegram ТАСС
FROM American