Власти Венесуэлы охотятся за головой лидера оппозиции
Венесуэльские власти предлагают $100,000 за информацию, которая поможет задержать оппозиционного кандидата в президенты Эдмундо Гонсалеса Уррутиа, поддерживаемого США.
Он возвращается в Аргентину, чтобы продолжить борьбу.
Власти Венесуэлы охотятся за головой лидера оппозиции
Венесуэльские власти предлагают $100,000 за информацию, которая поможет задержать оппозиционного кандидата в президенты Эдмундо Гонсалеса Уррутиа, поддерживаемого США.
Он возвращается в Аргентину, чтобы продолжить борьбу.
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Perpetrators of these scams will create a public group on Telegram to promote these investment packages that are usually accompanied by fake testimonies and sometimes advertised as being Shariah-compliant. Interested investors will be asked to directly message the representatives to begin investing in the various investment packages offered. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from sa
