Потому что в общем-то все государства у которых есть такая возможность, проводят террористические акты, но официально, такое никто не признаёт, да и вообще, желательно такое провернуть чужими руками (инглиш-стайл).
Но они сначала взяли на себя поддержку террористов в Мали (потом, обосравшись, открестились), потом в Сирии, а вот теперь сами взяли ответственность. Ну и кто им враг, после этого?
Потому что в общем-то все государства у которых есть такая возможность, проводят террористические акты, но официально, такое никто не признаёт, да и вообще, желательно такое провернуть чужими руками (инглиш-стайл).
Но они сначала взяли на себя поддержку террористов в Мали (потом, обосравшись, открестились), потом в Сирии, а вот теперь сами взяли ответственность. Ну и кто им враг, после этого?
BY Энсин звездолёта «Потёмкин»
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from sa
