Вечером 16 июля 1918 года Татьяна допоздна читала Александре Фёдоровне Библию. Через несколько часов их разбудили, велели одеться и спуститься в подвал — якобы для переезда в другое здание, но сначала — для фотографирования. Всю семью выстроили в ряд. Позже участники казни говорили, что Татьяна встала рядом с царицей, поближе, — последнее, что она смогла сделать для мамы...
Вечером 16 июля 1918 года Татьяна допоздна читала Александре Фёдоровне Библию. Через несколько часов их разбудили, велели одеться и спуститься в подвал — якобы для переезда в другое здание, но сначала — для фотографирования. Всю семью выстроили в ряд. Позже участники казни говорили, что Татьяна встала рядом с царицей, поближе, — последнее, что она смогла сделать для мамы...
These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from sa
