Я удаляю ручками, чтоб наверняка, но пользователям Android могу порекомендовать вот эту программу! Добавляется в share sheet, после чего может открывать второй share sheet уже изнутри себя. Итог — буквально плюс один шаг к стандартному системному механизму «поделиться».
Я удаляю ручками, чтоб наверняка, но пользователям Android могу порекомендовать вот эту программу! Добавляется в share sheet, после чего может открывать второй share sheet уже изнутри себя. Итог — буквально плюс один шаг к стандартному системному механизму «поделиться».
But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from sa
