The 25th Amendment can be applied retroactively, you know.
Trump DID say the 25th Amendment was no threat to him…but it WOULD end up haunting Joe Biden.
If a company President is demented, and his staff is revealed to have been hiding this while they ran the company themselves for their own benefit using him as a figurehead…legally how do any of the ACTIONS taken by the staff survive a legal challenge in court?
Remember: it’s already in the official federal record from a special council named Robert Hur that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia and Hur knew that almost 2 years ago when he interviewed Biden over the classified documents found at his house.
The 25th Amendment can be applied retroactively, you know.
Trump DID say the 25th Amendment was no threat to him…but it WOULD end up haunting Joe Biden.
If a company President is demented, and his staff is revealed to have been hiding this while they ran the company themselves for their own benefit using him as a figurehead…legally how do any of the ACTIONS taken by the staff survive a legal challenge in court?
Remember: it’s already in the official federal record from a special council named Robert Hur that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia and Hur knew that almost 2 years ago when he interviewed Biden over the classified documents found at his house.
These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. NEWS
from sa
