В современной России квир-сообщество оказалось под ударом: новые репрессивные законы, преследования и запреты стали частью повседневной реальности.
🔹Почему ЛГБТК+ люди стали мишенью для государства? 🔹Как репрессии изменили сообщество и где искать поддержку тем, кто остается в стране? 🔹Как культура и искусство помогают сохранять идентичность и солидарность?
Об этом Всеволод Чернозуб поговорил с Марией Лацинской — ЛГБТК+ активисткой и журналисткой, которая прошла большой путь и сейчас живет в Варшаве. Мария делится своим опытом, размышляет о роли активизма в политике и рассказывает, как бережно и безопасно говорить в эпоху репрессий.
В современной России квир-сообщество оказалось под ударом: новые репрессивные законы, преследования и запреты стали частью повседневной реальности.
🔹Почему ЛГБТК+ люди стали мишенью для государства? 🔹Как репрессии изменили сообщество и где искать поддержку тем, кто остается в стране? 🔹Как культура и искусство помогают сохранять идентичность и солидарность?
Об этом Всеволод Чернозуб поговорил с Марией Лацинской — ЛГБТК+ активисткой и журналисткой, которая прошла большой путь и сейчас живет в Варшаве. Мария делится своим опытом, размышляет о роли активизма в политике и рассказывает, как бережно и безопасно говорить в эпоху репрессий.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from us
