Южный окружной военный суд приговорил к 11 годам лишения свободы жителя Ингушетии, который перевел 14 млн рублей «Исламскому государству».
Фигурант осуществлял сбор денежных средств для дальнейшего финансирования деятельности запрещённой в России международной террористической организации "Исламское государство". Установлено, что он собрал и передал организации свыше 14 млн рублей.
Решением суда он признан виновным в преступлении, которое предусмотрено ч. 5 ст.33, ч. 4 ст. 205.1 УК РФ («Террористический акт»), и приговорён к лишению свободы на срок 11 лет.
Южный окружной военный суд приговорил к 11 годам лишения свободы жителя Ингушетии, который перевел 14 млн рублей «Исламскому государству».
Фигурант осуществлял сбор денежных средств для дальнейшего финансирования деятельности запрещённой в России международной террористической организации "Исламское государство". Установлено, что он собрал и передал организации свыше 14 млн рублей.
Решением суда он признан виновным в преступлении, которое предусмотрено ч. 5 ст.33, ч. 4 ст. 205.1 УК РФ («Террористический акт»), и приговорён к лишению свободы на срок 11 лет.
It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from us