Предполагаемого убийцу генерала-лейтенанта Кириллова и его адъютанта Поликарпова, Ахмада К., привезли на место преступления.
Там сегодня должны пройти следственные действия.
Ахмада задержали позавчера вечером. Он сразу же признал вину и рассказал следователями детально о своих действиях. Сегодня он должен будет еще раз рассказать и показать силовикам, как он действовал.
Предполагаемого убийцу генерала-лейтенанта Кириллова и его адъютанта Поликарпова, Ахмада К., привезли на место преступления.
Там сегодня должны пройти следственные действия.
Ахмада задержали позавчера вечером. Он сразу же признал вину и рассказал следователями детально о своих действиях. Сегодня он должен будет еще раз рассказать и показать силовикам, как он действовал.
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from sg
