أعتقد أننا تجاوزنا مصيبة عدم إدخال الطعام والماء والدواء لإخواننا، وصرنا ندعو ونرجو ألا نشهد بأعيننا مذبحة يعد لها الكفار يعاونهم فيها إخوانهم المنافقين كلَّ معونة.. وأمر المنافقين في ذلك علانية ليس سرا، يذكرونه تصريحا لا تلميحا. اللهم لا يأتي شوال إلا بخيرك ورحمتك وهدايتك وفضلك، في غير ضراء ولا فتنة.
أعتقد أننا تجاوزنا مصيبة عدم إدخال الطعام والماء والدواء لإخواننا، وصرنا ندعو ونرجو ألا نشهد بأعيننا مذبحة يعد لها الكفار يعاونهم فيها إخوانهم المنافقين كلَّ معونة.. وأمر المنافقين في ذلك علانية ليس سرا، يذكرونه تصريحا لا تلميحا. اللهم لا يأتي شوال إلا بخيرك ورحمتك وهدايتك وفضلك، في غير ضراء ولا فتنة.
BY قناة: خالد بهاء الدين
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from sg
