من الطبيعي أن يشعر الإنسان بالقلق أو بالفزع، من حين إلى آخر أما إذا كان الإحساس بالقلق يتكرر في أحيان متقاربة دون أي سبب حقيقي، إلى درجة إنه يعيق مجرى الحياة اليومي الطبيعي فالمرجح أن هذا الإنسان يعاني من اضطراب القلق.
هذا الاضطراب يسبب القلق الزائد وغير الواقعي وشعورا بالخوف، وهو يفوق ما يمكن اعتباره رد فعل طبيعيا على حالة معينة. #يُتبع
من الطبيعي أن يشعر الإنسان بالقلق أو بالفزع، من حين إلى آخر أما إذا كان الإحساس بالقلق يتكرر في أحيان متقاربة دون أي سبب حقيقي، إلى درجة إنه يعيق مجرى الحياة اليومي الطبيعي فالمرجح أن هذا الإنسان يعاني من اضطراب القلق.
هذا الاضطراب يسبب القلق الزائد وغير الواقعي وشعورا بالخوف، وهو يفوق ما يمكن اعتباره رد فعل طبيعيا على حالة معينة. #يُتبع
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels.
from sg
