Друзья! Мы хотим вас познакомить с нашим дружественным каналом, который всеми силами распространяет крепкую многовековую и непоколебимую дружбу: <♥️Ирана🇮🇷 и России🇷🇺♥️>
В этом канале: ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Вы узнаете о самой актуальной и о самой исторической моде в Иране 🇮🇷.
Вы будете осведомлены о самых жарких новостей ближнего востока 🔥🌍.
Вы узнаете о дружбеИрана и России, о его духовности, о его народе, больше чем когда либо❗🫂.
Друзья! Мы хотим вас познакомить с нашим дружественным каналом, который всеми силами распространяет крепкую многовековую и непоколебимую дружбу: <♥️Ирана🇮🇷 и России🇷🇺♥️>
В этом канале: ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Вы узнаете о самой актуальной и о самой исторической моде в Иране 🇮🇷.
Вы будете осведомлены о самых жарких новостей ближнего востока 🔥🌍.
Вы узнаете о дружбеИрана и России, о его духовности, о его народе, больше чем когда либо❗🫂.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from sg
