PETE HEGSETH, on his philosophy on WAR: "We don't want to fight, we want to deter them... and we want to end them responsibly. But if we need to fight them, we're going to bring OVERWHELMING and DECISIVE force - to close with and destroy the enemy, and bring our boys home." 🇺🇸Join👉@SGTnewsNetwork 📎Twitter▪️Truth Social
PETE HEGSETH, on his philosophy on WAR: "We don't want to fight, we want to deter them... and we want to end them responsibly. But if we need to fight them, we're going to bring OVERWHELMING and DECISIVE force - to close with and destroy the enemy, and bring our boys home." 🇺🇸Join👉@SGTnewsNetwork 📎Twitter▪️Truth Social
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat.
from sg
