Так, без паники! Речь шла о защите от агрессивного блока НАТО. Про внутренние угрозы никто не говорил. И вообще, если бы не рост преступности, кого воевать-то отправлять, а? Многоходовочка, понимать надо!
Так, без паники! Речь шла о защите от агрессивного блока НАТО. Про внутренние угрозы никто не говорил. И вообще, если бы не рост преступности, кого воевать-то отправлять, а? Многоходовочка, понимать надо!
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from sg
