Подкаст "Вокруг права": обсуждаем, что модно, что вышло из моды, а что вечно. В гостях старший юрист практики интеллектуальной собственности, медиа и технологий Seven Hills Legal, автор канала @law_in_fashionАлександра Бахтиозина.
О чем говорили: - что привело Александру в fashion law и fashion studies? - юридическая мода: как одеваться, чтобы выглядеть стильно? - какой образ выбесит судью с первого взгляда? - почему не стоит судиться по поводу ювелирных изделий в Костромской области?
Подкаст "Вокруг права": обсуждаем, что модно, что вышло из моды, а что вечно. В гостях старший юрист практики интеллектуальной собственности, медиа и технологий Seven Hills Legal, автор канала @law_in_fashionАлександра Бахтиозина.
О чем говорили: - что привело Александру в fashion law и fashion studies? - юридическая мода: как одеваться, чтобы выглядеть стильно? - какой образ выбесит судью с первого взгляда? - почему не стоит судиться по поводу ювелирных изделий в Костромской области?
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from sg
