„Die Nerven scheinen @RegSprecher Steffen Hebestreit in der Causa #NordStream blank zu liegen. Anders ist seine Reaktion auf die Frage #BPK, ob #Bundesregierung neue Infos in der Angelegenheit hat & mittlerweile ausschließen kann, dass #USA daran beteiligt waren nicht erklärbar […]“
„Die Nerven scheinen @RegSprecher Steffen Hebestreit in der Causa #NordStream blank zu liegen. Anders ist seine Reaktion auf die Frage #BPK, ob #Bundesregierung neue Infos in der Angelegenheit hat & mittlerweile ausschließen kann, dass #USA daran beteiligt waren nicht erklärbar […]“
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. The SC urges the public to refer to the SC’s I nvestor Alert List before investing. The list contains details of unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals. Members of the public who suspect that they have been approached by unauthorised firms or individuals offering schemes that promise unrealistic returns Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted.
from sg
