«Собеседник» - очень долго держался. Что называется, герои не умирают✊ Слова поддержки и сочувствие, восхищение редакционной смелостью журналистов в реальных обстоятельствах👋
Удивительно, что я помню, как в 1984 году «Собеседник» выходил, как приложение к «Комсомольской правде», которую мы выписывали дома много лет. И как потом они разошлись и какие разные судьбы сейчас у «Комсомольской правды» и «Собеседника»🫥
«Собеседник» - очень долго держался. Что называется, герои не умирают✊ Слова поддержки и сочувствие, восхищение редакционной смелостью журналистов в реальных обстоятельствах👋
Удивительно, что я помню, как в 1984 году «Собеседник» выходил, как приложение к «Комсомольской правде», которую мы выписывали дома много лет. И как потом они разошлись и какие разные судьбы сейчас у «Комсомольской правды» и «Собеседника»🫥
BY Арина Бородина
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from sg
