Перед вами «Портрет Луи Вокселя» (1909). Здесь Жюль Шере запечатлел критика, давшего имена двум модернистским течениям в живописи XX века.
Высмеивая работы Матисса и его единомышленников, Воксель назвал художников дикими зверьми (les fauves). А работы Брака и Пикассо считал составленными из маленьких кубиков. В итоге из насмешливых прозвищ и едких замечаний появились названия «фовизм» и «кубизм».
Перед вами «Портрет Луи Вокселя» (1909). Здесь Жюль Шере запечатлел критика, давшего имена двум модернистским течениям в живописи XX века.
Высмеивая работы Матисса и его единомышленников, Воксель назвал художников дикими зверьми (les fauves). А работы Брака и Пикассо считал составленными из маленьких кубиков. В итоге из насмешливых прозвищ и едких замечаний появились названия «фовизм» и «кубизм».
What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough
from sg
