ПО ДОМАМ! | Telegram Webview: artinprivatehand/600 -

Telegram Group & Telegram Channel

ПО ДОМАМ!

#итогигода

Самые крупные аукционные торги года позади, а это значит, что новых ценовых рекордов на произведения искусства уже не будет. Список (десятку) самых дорогих работ в истории этот год не изменил, но потратились коллекционеры изрядно. Вот ТОП-10 самых дорогих картин, проданных на аукционах в этом году.

1. Рене Магритт. Империя света. $121,16 млн
2. Эд Руша. Standard Station. $68,26 млн
3. Клод Моне. Кувшинки. $65,5 млн
4. Жан-Мишель Баския. Без названия (EL MAR). $46,48 млн
5. Рене Магритт. Близкий друг. $42,12 млн
6. Энди Уорхол. Цветы. $35,49 млн
7. Клод Моне. Стог сена в Живерни. $34,8 млн
8. Винсент Ван Гог. Уголок сада с бабочками. $33,2 млн
9. Марк Ротко. Без названия (Желтый и Синий). $32,48 млн
10. Винсент Ван Гог. Пришвартованные лодки. $32,19 млн

#магритт #ротко #вангог #моне #эдруша

www.group-telegram.com/sg/artinprivatehand.com/600

179 viewsDec 15 at 16:05

group-telegram.com/artinprivatehand/600

Create: 2024-12-15
Last Update: 2025-03-13 18:17:05

#итогигода

Самые крупные аукционные торги года позади, а это значит, что новых ценовых рекордов на произведения искусства уже не будет. Список (десятку) самых дорогих работ в истории этот год не изменил, но потратились коллекционеры изрядно. Вот ТОП-10 самых дорогих картин, проданных на аукционах в этом году.

1. Рене Магритт. Империя света. $121,16 млн
2. Эд Руша. Standard Station. $68,26 млн
3. Клод Моне. Кувшинки. $65,5 млн
4. Жан-Мишель Баския. Без названия (EL MAR). $46,48 млн
5. Рене Магритт. Близкий друг. $42,12 млн
6. Энди Уорхол. Цветы. $35,49 млн
7. Клод Моне. Стог сена в Живерни. $34,8 млн
8. Винсент Ван Гог. Уголок сада с бабочками. $33,2 млн
9. Марк Ротко. Без названия (Желтый и Синий). $32,48 млн
10. Винсент Ван Гог. Пришвартованные лодки. $32,19 млн

#магритт #ротко #вангог #моне #эдруша

BY ПО ДОМАМ!

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/artinprivatehand/600

Open in Telegram

Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: 2025-03-13|

Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from sg

Telegram ПО ДОМАМ!
FROM American