В России в ноябре объем выдачи потребительских кредитов снизился на 33,4% - до 229,2 млрд рублей (в октябре было 344,3 млрд рублей), сообщило НБКИ.
Также упало и число выданных кредитов - до 1,7 млн с 2,15 млн в октябре. Сильнее всего сокращение оказалось в Саратовской (-22,9%) и Оренбургской (-22,6%) областях, а также Алтайском крае (-22,5%).
В России в ноябре объем выдачи потребительских кредитов снизился на 33,4% - до 229,2 млрд рублей (в октябре было 344,3 млрд рублей), сообщило НБКИ.
Также упало и число выданных кредитов - до 1,7 млн с 2,15 млн в октябре. Сильнее всего сокращение оказалось в Саратовской (-22,9%) и Оренбургской (-22,6%) областях, а также Алтайском крае (-22,5%).
BY Асфальт
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts.
from sg
