Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Brian Cates @drawandstrike

There are only 2 possibilities when Rience Priebus says to @GenFlynn that he and others were shown a document by then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy AG Sally Yates that showed Flynn discussing sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Because the actual transcripts of the phone calls **clearly show Flynn never discussed any sanctions**...

1. McCabe and Yates showed Priebus and others a FAKE DOCUMENT that made a false claim

or

2. Priebus is not telling the truth when he told Flynn he and others [presumably Trump and Pence among them] were shown such a document by McCabe and Yates.

I am **really hoping** once @PamBondi is running the DOJ and @Kash_Patel is in charge of the FBI, SOMEBODY can get to the bottom of this.

Does that faked document claiming Flynn discussed sanctions actually exist?

Or did Priebus just make it up?

❗️INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.

Since this mythical 'Logan Act violation' was the impetus for Flynn's firing and then his more than 3 years prosecution by the FBI/DOJ/Mueller Special Counsel for supposedly lying to federal agents about discussing those sanctions, and this supposed document was flashed around to justify Flynn's firing, whether or not it ACTUALLY EXISTS is a very important question.

Somebody not only had to engage in a federal crime by leaking classified intelligence transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak phone calls...

❗️THERE WAS NOTHING ACTUALLY IN THE PHONE CALL TRANSCRIPTS THAT COULD BE USED TO ATTACK FLYNN WITH.

So somebody - we still don't know who - was forced to get EXCEEDINGLY CLEVER here to present the **appearance** that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak when in fact, he hadn't.

So the criminal leak of the classified transcripts is COMPOUNDED by criminal manufacture of a fake 'crime' to prosecute Flynn for:

Supposedly lying to two FBI agents about sanctions when it is now an uncontestable matter of PUBLIC RECORD that Flynn did not lie to them.

I will not leave this alone. Someone is going to end up paying for both the criminal leak and the false accusation that wasn't even in the leaked transcripts.

🎱@MagicEightBallRedux
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM



group-telegram.com/australiaoneparty_official/45574
Create:
Last Update:

Brian Cates @drawandstrike

There are only 2 possibilities when Rience Priebus says to @GenFlynn that he and others were shown a document by then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy AG Sally Yates that showed Flynn discussing sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Because the actual transcripts of the phone calls **clearly show Flynn never discussed any sanctions**...

1. McCabe and Yates showed Priebus and others a FAKE DOCUMENT that made a false claim

or

2. Priebus is not telling the truth when he told Flynn he and others [presumably Trump and Pence among them] were shown such a document by McCabe and Yates.

I am **really hoping** once @PamBondi is running the DOJ and @Kash_Patel is in charge of the FBI, SOMEBODY can get to the bottom of this.

Does that faked document claiming Flynn discussed sanctions actually exist?

Or did Priebus just make it up?

❗️INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.

Since this mythical 'Logan Act violation' was the impetus for Flynn's firing and then his more than 3 years prosecution by the FBI/DOJ/Mueller Special Counsel for supposedly lying to federal agents about discussing those sanctions, and this supposed document was flashed around to justify Flynn's firing, whether or not it ACTUALLY EXISTS is a very important question.

Somebody not only had to engage in a federal crime by leaking classified intelligence transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak phone calls...

❗️THERE WAS NOTHING ACTUALLY IN THE PHONE CALL TRANSCRIPTS THAT COULD BE USED TO ATTACK FLYNN WITH.

So somebody - we still don't know who - was forced to get EXCEEDINGLY CLEVER here to present the **appearance** that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak when in fact, he hadn't.

So the criminal leak of the classified transcripts is COMPOUNDED by criminal manufacture of a fake 'crime' to prosecute Flynn for:

Supposedly lying to two FBI agents about sanctions when it is now an uncontestable matter of PUBLIC RECORD that Flynn did not lie to them.

I will not leave this alone. Someone is going to end up paying for both the criminal leak and the false accusation that wasn't even in the leaked transcripts.

🎱@MagicEightBallRedux

BY AustraliaOneParty_Official




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/australiaoneparty_official/45574

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. Now safely in France with his spouse and three of his children, Kliuchnikov scrolls through Telegram to learn about the devastation happening in his home country. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children.
from sg


Telegram AustraliaOneParty_Official
FROM American