Несанкционированная свалка в поселке Ильичево Гурьевского района превратилась практически в геенну огненную.
План по рекультивации еще семь лет назад заказывали за 1,8 миллиона. Но дальше планов дело не пошло. В прошлом году уже подключилась прокуратура, потребовав ликвидировать свалку.
Но экологи, заметившие проблему, утверждают – ничего не произошло с тех пор. Биоотходы, бытовой мусор и прочая токсичная дрянь продолжают тлеть вот уже столько лет, а новые «материалы» так и продолжают сваливать, несмотря на запрет.
Несанкционированная свалка в поселке Ильичево Гурьевского района превратилась практически в геенну огненную.
План по рекультивации еще семь лет назад заказывали за 1,8 миллиона. Но дальше планов дело не пошло. В прошлом году уже подключилась прокуратура, потребовав ликвидировать свалку.
Но экологи, заметившие проблему, утверждают – ничего не произошло с тех пор. Биоотходы, бытовой мусор и прочая токсичная дрянь продолжают тлеть вот уже столько лет, а новые «материалы» так и продолжают сваливать, несмотря на запрет.
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Now safely in France with his spouse and three of his children, Kliuchnikov scrolls through Telegram to learn about the devastation happening in his home country.
from sg
