Мечи, рога и посиделки на полу: зачем подростки в аниме-костюмах заполонили челябинский ТРК
В Челябинском ТРК «Куба» прошел фестиваль косплея. Поклонники японской анимации и видеоигр выбирали самый необычный костюм и яркую презентацию. Фотокорреспондент КП-Челябинск Валерий Звонарев пошел за покупками и обомлел: его окружили подростки с оружием, огромными ушами и мечами.
Мечи, рога и посиделки на полу: зачем подростки в аниме-костюмах заполонили челябинский ТРК
В Челябинском ТРК «Куба» прошел фестиваль косплея. Поклонники японской анимации и видеоигр выбирали самый необычный костюм и яркую презентацию. Фотокорреспондент КП-Челябинск Валерий Звонарев пошел за покупками и обомлел: его окружили подростки с оружием, огромными ушами и мечами.
Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors.
from sg
